|
Main
- books.jibble.org
My Books
- IRC Hacks
Misc. Articles
- Meaning of Jibble
- M4 Su Doku
- Computer Scrapbooking
- Setting up Java
- Bootable Java
- Cookies in Java
- Dynamic Graphs
- Social Shakespeare
External Links
- Paul Mutton
- Jibble Photo Gallery
- Jibble Forums
- Google Landmarks
- Jibble Shop
- Free Books
- Intershot Ltd
|
books.jibble.org
Previous Page
| Next Page
Page 15
(5) Easy to insert a fuse.
(6) Great stability at all natural temperatures and when used
in wet localities.
Neither blasting gelatine, dynamite nor gun-cotton fulfills all these
conditions; but they satisfy many of them and are more powerful than
other substances. For the destruction of walls, trees, rails, bridges,
etc., it is simply necessary to attach to them small bags of
explosive, which are ignited by means of blasters' fuse and a cap of
fulminate of mercury, or by an electric fuse.
We now come to the application of high explosives to warfare in the
shape of bursting charges for shells. This is the latest phase of the
problem, and it is undoubtedly fraught with the most important
consequences to both attack and defense. Difficult as it has been to
obtain an exact estimate of the force of different explosives under
water, the problem is far greater out of the water and under the
ordinary conditions of shell fire; the principal obstacle being in the
fact that it is physically impossible to control the force of large
quantities in order to measure it, and small quantities give irregular
results. Theoretically, the matter has been accomplished by Berthelot,
the head of the French government "Commission of Explosives," by
calculating the volume of gas produced, heat developed, etc.; and this
method is excellent for obtaining a fair idea of the specific pressure
of any new explosive that may be brought forward, and determining
whether it is worth while to investigate it further; but the
explosives differ so much from each other in point of sensitiveness,
weight, physical condition, velocity of explosive wave, influence of
temperature and humidity, that we cannot determine from mere
theoretical considerations all that we would like to know. Various
methods of arriving at comparative values have been tried, but the
figures are very variable, as will be seen by the following tables.
Berthelot's commission, some ten years ago, exploded ten to thirty
grammes of each in 300 pound blocks of lead and measured the increased
size of the hole thus made. The relative result was:
No. 1 dynamite 1.0
Dry gun-cotton 1.17
Nitro-glycerine 1.20
Powder blew out and could not be measured.
Mr. R.C. Williams, at the Boston Institute of Technology, in the
winter of 1888 and 1889, tried the same method, but used six grammes
in forty-five pound blocks of lead. He obtained a relative result of--
No. 1 dynamite 1.0
Dry gun-cotton 1.37
Nitro-glycerine 2.51
Explosive gelatine 2.57
Forcite gelatine 2.7
Warm nitro-glycerine 2.7
Gunpowder 0.1
The powder gave great trouble in this case, also, by blowing out.
M. Chalon, a French engineer, obtained some years ago, with a small
mortar, firing a projectile of thirty kilos and using a charge of ten
grammes of each explosives, the following ranges:
Meters.
Blasting powder 2.6
No. 1 dynamite 31.4
Forcite of 75 per cent. N.G. 43.6
Blasting gelatine 45.0
Roux and Sarran obtained by experiments in bursting small bomb shells
the following comparative strengths of ranges:
Powder 1.0
Gun-cotton 6.5
Nitro-glycerine 10.0
In actual blasting work the results vary altogether with the nature of
the material encountered, and with the result that is desired to be
accomplished, viz., throwing out, shattering, or mere displacement.
Chalon gives for quarrying:
Previous Page
| Next Page
|
|