|
Main
- books.jibble.org
My Books
- IRC Hacks
Misc. Articles
- Meaning of Jibble
- M4 Su Doku
- Computer Scrapbooking
- Setting up Java
- Bootable Java
- Cookies in Java
- Dynamic Graphs
- Social Shakespeare
External Links
- Paul Mutton
- Jibble Photo Gallery
- Jibble Forums
- Google Landmarks
- Jibble Shop
- Free Books
- Intershot Ltd
|
books.jibble.org
Previous Page
| Next Page
Page 10
The Creusot works alone, of all competitors, were able to fight
against the general infatuation. Many comparative experiments had
already demonstrated the superiority of the Creusot "all steel" plates
over the Cammell plates, but Messrs. Schneider & Go. were not willing
to stop here, and finally produced the new nickel steel plate, which
is by far superior to their steel plates.
Some comparative trials of these various armor plates have recently
been made by a military commission of the United States at the
Annapolis proving grounds. Three plates, one a Cammell, the second a
steel, and the third a nickel steel (the two last from Creusot), were
here submitted to firing, under absolutely identical conditions.
Our engravings show the proving grounds and the details of the
arrangements adopted for backing the plates.
Of the three plates, the Cammell was the thickest (11 in.) The steel
one was 103/4 in. in thickness, and the nickel steel 101/2 in. The last,
therefore, was at a disadvantage with respect to the two others.
The plates were arranged tangentially to an arc of a circle whose
center was occupied by the pivot of the gun, and consequently at right
angles with the latter. The piece employed was a 6 in. gun, 35
calibers in length. The distance of its muzzle from the plates
attacked was 28 ft.
[Illustration]
The charge was 44 lb. of brown prismatic powder. The projectile was a
100 lb. Holtzer shell. Under these circumstances, the initial velocity
was 2,074 ft. and the energy at the impact was 9,970,396 ft. lb.
A beginning was made by firing four shots at each plate in the
bisectrix of the corners. Then the 6 in. gun was replaced by an 8 in.
one, throwing a 209 lb. Firth projectile, with an energy at the impact
of 20,795,000 ft. lb.
Each of the plates then received in its center a final blow from this
projectile.
Our engraving represents the state of the plates after this last shot.
[Illustration: ARMORED PLATE TESTS AT ANNAPOLIS]
There is no need of being a great expert in questions of artillery to
discover on what side the superiority is found, and to see that the
Cammell plate, almost entirely in fragments, is absolutely incapable
of protection, while its two competitors are still in a state to
resist.
In one of our engravings may be seen, too, the state of the shells
after each of the three shots.
[Illustration]
The commission immediately and unanimously classified the three plates
in the following order of superiority: (1) Nickel steel; (2) all
steel; (3) compound.
This triumph of French industry merits mention so much the more in
that it was obtained in a series of experiments made in a foreign
country--that is to say, under indisputable conditions of
impartiality.-_L'Illustration._
* * * * *
HIGH EXPLOSIVES IN WARFARE.[1]
[Footnote 1: A lecture delivered before the Franklin Institute,
Philadelphia, November 28, 1890. From the _Journal_ of the Institute.]
BY COMMANDER F.M. BARBER, U.S.N.
In commencing my paper this evening I desire to call your attention to
the fact that I am dealing with a subject which, though not
theoretical, is still hardly practical, for as a matter of fact high
explosives cannot be said to have yet been regularly used in warfare,
and I hope you will pardon me if in consequence my statements appear
in some respects unsatisfactory and my theories unsound. My subject,
however, is no more obscure than future naval warfare generally. All
civilized nations are spending millions of money for fighting purposes
directly in opposition to the higher feelings of the better class of
their inhabitants. The political atmosphere of Europe is the cause of
this, but its consequence is the development of theoretical plans of
ships which are no sooner commenced than the rapid march of
mechanical, chemical, and electrical science shows them to be faulty
in some particular feature, and others are laid down only to be
superseded in their turn.
Previous Page
| Next Page
|
|