|
Main
- books.jibble.org
My Books
- IRC Hacks
Misc. Articles
- Meaning of Jibble
- M4 Su Doku
- Computer Scrapbooking
- Setting up Java
- Bootable Java
- Cookies in Java
- Dynamic Graphs
- Social Shakespeare
External Links
- Paul Mutton
- Jibble Photo Gallery
- Jibble Forums
- Google Landmarks
- Jibble Shop
- Free Books
- Intershot Ltd
|
books.jibble.org
Previous Page
| Next Page
Page 38
It is likely that there are great varieties of condition in different
comets, and in the same comet at times. We see them but a few days
out of the possible millions of their periodic time; we see them
only close to the sun, under the spur of its tremendous attraction
and terrible heat. This gives us ample knowledge of the path of
their orbit and time of their revolution, but little ground for
judgment of their condition, when they slowly round the uttermost
cape of their far-voyaging, in the terrible cold and darkness,
to commence their homeward flight. The unsolved problems are not
all in the distant sun and more distant stars, but one of them
is carried by us, sometimes near, sometimes far off; but our
acquaintance with the possible forms and conditions of matter is
too limited to enable us to master the difficulties.
_Will Comets strike the Earth?_
Very likely, since one or two have done so within a recent period.
What will be the effect? That depends on circumstances. There is
good reason to suppose we passed through the tail of a comet in
1861, and the only [Page 134] observable effect was a peculiar
phosphorescent mist. If the comet were composed of small meteoric
masses a brilliant shower would be the result. But if we fairly
encountered a nucleus of any considerable mass and solidity, the
result would be far more serious. The mass of Donati's comet has
been estimated by M. Faye to be 1/20000 of that of the earth. If
this amount of matter were dense as water, it would make a globe
five hundred miles in diameter; and if as dense as Professor Peirce
proved the nucleus of this comet to be, its impact with the earth
would develop heat enough to melt and vaporize the hardest rocks.
Happily there is little fear of this: as Professor Newcomb says, "So
small is the earth in comparison with celestial space, that if one
were to shut his eyes and fire at random in the air, the chance of
bringing down a bird would be better than that of a comet of any
kind striking the earth." Besides, we are not living under a
government of chance, but under that of an Almighty Father, who
upholdeth all things by the word of his power; and no world can come
to ruin till he sees that it is best.
[Page 135]
VIII.
THE PLANETS AS INDIVIDUALS.
"Through faith we understand that the worlds [plural] were framed
by the word of God, so that things which were seen were not made
of things which do appear."--_Heb._ xi. 3.
[Page 136]
"O rich and various man! Thou palace of sight and sound, carrying
in thy senses the morning, and the night, and the unfathomable
galaxy; in thy brain the geometry of the city of God; in thy heart
the power of love, and the realms of right and wrong. An individual
man is a fruit which it costs all the foregoing ages to form and
ripen. He is strong, not to do but to live; not in his arms, but
in his heart; not as an agent, but as a fact."--EMERSON.
[Page 137]
VII.
_THE PLANETS AS INDIVIDUALS._
How many bodies there may be revolving about the sun we have no
means to determine or arithmetic to express. When the new star
of the American Republic appeared, there were but six planets
discovered. Since then three regions of the solar system have been
explored with wonderful success. The outlying realms beyond Saturn
yielded the planet Uranus in 1781, and Neptune in 1846. The middle
region between Jupiter and Mars yielded the little planetoid Ceres
in 1801, Pallas in 1802, and one hundred and ninety others since.
The inner region between Mercury and the sun is of necessity full
of small meteoric bodies; the question is, are there any bodies
large enough to be seen?
The same great genius of Leverrier that gave us Neptune from the
observed perturbations of Uranus, pointed out perturbations in
Mercury that necessitated either a planet or a group of planetoids
between Mercury and the sun. Theoretical astronomers, aided by the
fact that no planet had certainly been seen, and that all asserted
discoveries of one had been by inexperienced observers, inclined
to the belief in a group, or that the disturbance was caused by
the matter reflecting the zodiacal light.
Previous Page
| Next Page
|
|